Latest Blogs from SBS and Company LLP

    The Vires, Right & Retrospectivity - Transitional Credit


    Claim of credit accumulated in the returns of erstwhile regime under GST [1] regime by filing TRAN-01 return i.e. transitional credit is subject to vexatious litigation as many of the taxpayers failed to meet the due date prescribed in Rule 117[2]. The reasons for not meeting the due date are due to inefficiency of GST Portal[3], taxpayers are not vigilant of the time limit or due to confusion and chaos that was prevailing at the time when this new tax was introduced. A large number of writ petitions were filed between various High Courts expressing the inability to meet the due dates mainly due to inefficiency of GST Portal and accordingly requesting the courts to permit the filing of these returns.

    Based on various courts directions, Central Government admitted the inefficiency of GST Portal and sub-rule (1A) has been introduced in Rule 117 through which the due date has been extended to those categories of taxpayers who could produce evidence of their attempt to file the TRAN-01 return within due date but were unsuccessful due to technical difficulties of GST Portal. But the plight of those taxpayers who could not gather evidence relating to their attempt to file the TRAN-01 return was not addressed.

    In this backdrop, the vires of Rule 117 which imposed the time limit for filing TRAN-01 was challenged on the ground that no such power was conferred under Section 140[4] of CT Act[5] and is taking away the vested right over the accumulated transitional credit of previous regime. The High Courts have taken different stand on this issue and some of them ruled in favour of taxpayers while others were in favour of Revenue. The Finance Act, 2020 made retrospective amendment[6] to read timelines into Section 140 in order to nullify those judgements that were ruled in favour of the taxpayer.

    Role of Deeming Fiction in Domestic Legislation vis-à-vis Tax Treaty - An Exposition by UK Supreme Court in Fowler’s Judgment

    In a recent judgment of Fowler v. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs[1], the Supreme Court of United Kingdom had an occasion to deal with the role of deeming fiction in the domestic legislation and their applicability in the context of tax treaties. The said judgment elucidates certain important aspects which would have bearing on the international taxation. In this article, we would detail the facts, the reasonings and conclusions arrived by the Honourable Supreme Court of United Kingdom (UK SC) and also try to apply such principals to the Indian context to see the consequences arising thereof.

    Partner vis-à-vis Capital Gains

    The taxation when a personal asset is contributed as capital to a partnership firm and the taxation of amounts received when the partner retires from the firm or the firm dissolves is quite a complex one and no straight answers can be found. There are conflicting judgments on the said aspects and one has to carefully study between the lines to make a conscious decision as regards to taxability. In this article, we would like to dwell on the major judgments which have contributed to the resolution (or complexity) of issue.

    Indirect Transfers 2.0 - Study on Taxability of Gain on Alienation of Shares

    Opening Remarks:

    The acquisition of Flipkart by Walmart has attained considerable attention of media. The deal is to the tune US $ 16 Billion, making Flipkart as most valuable e-commerce marketplace in India. Now that the deal is done, the tax considerations/issues surface, one-after the other, the first being the issue of indirect transfers, which recently came up for consideration in the matter of Tiger Global. In this article, we shall deal with the recent judgment of Authority for Advance Rulings (for brevity ‘AAR’) in the matter of Tiger Global International II Holdings[1]. After setting out the ruling, taking this as a case study, we shall adventure to list out the favourable and adverse tax positions, position after MLI[2] and GAAR[3].

    Tax Collection at Source - Sale of Goods

    Finance Act, 2020 with an intention to widen and deepen the tax net has expanded the scope of provisions of tax collection at source for sale of goods. The obligation to collect tax at source is applicable only for specified sellers when sales were made to specified buyers, which are dealt at more appropriate place. The new provisions are made effective from 01st Oct 2020. In this write up, we shall deal with the new provision and obligations under the same.   

    Looking for suggestions?

    Subscribe SBS AND COMPANY LLP updates via Email!