Latest Blogs from SBS and Company LLP

    DTA Turnover Vs DTA Unit – SEZ Exemption

    We all are aware that the services provided to a unit located in SEZ or a developer of SEZ are exempted from service tax by way of Notification No 12/2013-ST dated 01.07.2013 subject to certain conditions, limitations and safeguards as specified in the said notification. 

    The notification provides for ab intio exemption from service tax for such specified services received by SEZ unit or developer which are exclusively used for authorised operations of the SEZ. Further, the service tax pertaining to such services which are not used exclusively for authorised operations of the SEZ shall be allowed by way of refund subject to certain conditions as mentioned below. 

    The said notification vide Para III (a) states that the services which are common to the authorised operations of the SEZ and the operation in the DTA Unit shall be distributed among the SEZ Unit and the DTA Unit in the manner as prescribed in Rule 7 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. That is to say the SEZ unit or developer can only claim refund of the service tax which is in proportion to the turnover of the SEZ Unit and credit of service tax in proportion to the turnover of DTA Unit shall not be allowed. 

    Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) Vs Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) – A Perspective

    Alternative Minimum Tax (Sec 115JC to 115JF): Finance Act 2011 has introduced payment of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) on Limited Liability Partnership. Finance Act, 2012 has extended the scope of AMT by making applicable it to all persons except companies. It is applicable if any person is claiming deduction U/S 10AA, 80IA to 80RRB except 80P and is payable on ‘Adjusted Total Income’ of the previous year. 

    It is applicable where the regular income tax payable for a previous year by a person (other than companies) is less than alternative minimum tax@ 18.5% payable for such previous year, the adjusted total income shall deemed to be the total income of the such person and be liable to pay tax @ 18.5% on ‘Adjusted Total Income’ and increased by surcharge, if any, and education cess. In this regard, in this article, we wish to distinguish the concepts of AMT and MAT as under: 

    Application of Section 50 and 50C

    Is it right in law in applying the section 50C and section 50 (depreciable assets) while computing capital gains on sale of depreciable assets? 

    Assessee is a partnership firm. It has sold the office building used earlier for business purpose during the previous year. The asset was sold for a consideration of Rs. 49, 43,525/-. The written down value of the said building after claiming depreciation for past years is Rs. 49,43,525/- and hence assessee declared the capital gains as NILL. 

    During the course of assessment proceedings the assessing office noticed that the value of the property as per the stamp duty valuation was Rs. 76, 49,000/-. According to him the full value consideration for transfer of the building is the value adopted for stamp value as per section 50C and after deducting the written down, value the balance amount is taxable as capital gains from transfer of building. 

    Disallowance Of Expenditure Due To Non - Compliance of TDS Provisions

    Section 40 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides for non-deduction of amount of expenditure specifically mentioned there in. One of the important provisions which merit our attention and faced by many assesses in day to day transactions is 40(a)(ia). 

    Section 40(a)(ia) provides for disallowance of expenditure in relation to interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalty, fees for professional services or fees for technical services payable to resident, or amounts payable to a resident contractor or sub – contractor for carrying out any work including supply of labour for carrying out any work. 

    The disallowance of amounts mentioned in section 40(a)(ia) will be made if the tax is not deducted at source or after deduction of tax at source has not paid the same on or before the due date specified in section 139(1)4

    The word “Payable” used in this section is subject matter of controversy. 

    This controversy is raised in various cases before ITAT, High Courts and finally the matter was settled by the Supreme Court. 

    Historical Background of Section 40a(ia): 

    Section 40a(ia) was introduced in the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act 2004 W.e.f 1st April, 2005. This section overrides the provisions of sections 30 to 38 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Initially the Finance Bill 2004 contains the word “amounts credited or paid” but later it was changed to “payable” in the Finance Act, 2004. This may be due to time limit provided for payment of TDS as per Rule 30 of the Income Tax Rules. Also using the word “paid” result in permanent disallowance, which was not the intention of legislation while introducing section 40(a)(ia). 

    Provisions, Procedure For Allotment Of Securities By Way Of Private Placement

    Unlike the Companies Act, 1956, the Companies Act, 2013, stipulates stringent provisions for allotment of securities. These provisions have also been made applicable to Private Companies. 

    The provisions of Section 42 and rules made thereunder are to be complied in case of allotment of Securities by Private placement and the provisions of Section 62 and rules made thereunder are to be complied in case of further issue of Securities on Preferential basis.

    The scope of Section 42 is vast, thereby any allotment even under Section 62, requires the compliance of provisions under Section 42. 

    The procedure and compliances required for issue of shares by way of Private Placement is as below: 

    1. Identifying a party who is interested in investing in the Company.
    2. Convening of Board Meeting to consider issue of security to such party, approval of draft letter of offer, and fixing of time, place and venue for convening Extra-ordinary General Meeting [EGM] for obtaining the approval of the members by way of special resolution for the proposed issue to proposed party.

    [Filing of Form MGT-14 with ROC, for the decision of the Board to issue shares [Filing pursuant to Sec. 179 (3) (c)].

    Looking for suggestions?

    Subscribe SBS AND COMPANY LLP updates via Email!